Blake appeals the brand new conclusion judgment choice of one’s Columbiana County Court regarding Prominent Pleas away from Blake’s action against Family Coupons & Mortgage Co
< 1> This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties ‘ briefs. Pro-se Appellant , Veronica A. , and New England Square Condominium Association , and Home Savings’ counterclaim against Blake and third party defendants Richard E. Whitley , Heritage Title Agency, Inc. , and Columbiana County Treasurer .
< 2> Blake’s claims against all parties , as well as her defenses against Home Savings’ counterclaim, were predicated on her allegation that she did not have valid title to her condominium property. On appeal, Blake argues that the trial court erred in finding that her property was not originally and irrevocably dedicated to public use by the original developer, Sitler Construction, Inc. Blake also argues that the trial court erroneously found that Blake owned her property in fee simple, because there was an encumbrance on her property. Finally, Blake argues that the trial court should not have granted Home Savings’ foreclosure via summary judgment, because Blake presented an issue of material fact regarding the validity of her title to the property, and therefore regarding the validity of the mortgage.
The demo legal is the reason decision refuted Blake’s action to possess conclusion view , granted Appellee Family Savings’ action having conclusion judgment , ignored Blake’s ailment, discovered Blake and you may Whitley in standard on the promissory notice, and you may purchased a property foreclosure to your Blake’s home loan
< 3> The partial documentation of plats and declarations provided by Blake in the proceedings below do not indicate that her property or the lot on which it is located was ever dedicated by Sitler for public use. Continue reading